[MITgcm-devel] Fwd: checkpoint62p

Chris Hill cnh at mit.edu
Sun Dec 19 19:37:49 EST 2010


If possible, getting the 2d in with some RK4 now would be good.
Maybe we can have a go on Monday.

Chris

On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 3:55 PM, aklocker <aklocker at mit.edu> wrote:
> That's up to you guys. But somebody would definitely have to check the code
> i
> changed (the 4th order RK)..
> Or should we just finish the whole thing in january and put it all in
> together?
>
> Zitat von Oliver Jahn <jahn at MIT.EDU>:
>
>> Would it make sense to merge what we have now (and what works in 2d)?
>>
>> On 2010-12-19 07:23, aklocker wrote:
>>>
>>> When would you need everything by? I still have to test the 3D
>>> advection...and
>>> there is quasi no documentation..
>>> Andreas
>>>
>>> Zitat von Chris Hill <cnh at MIT.EDU>:
>>>
>>>> Oliver/Andreas,
>>>>
>>>> Any chance we could get sync'd up float code
>>>> in there?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Chris
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>> From: Jean-Michel Campin <jmc at ocean.mit.edu>
>>>> Date: Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM
>>>> Subject: [MITgcm-devel] checkpoint62p
>>>> To: MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> going to check-in a little fix (after Gael's changes, and by the way,
>>>> not found much info in tag-index ...) and do the tag after.
>>>> So better not to check-in stuff until tag is done.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Jean-Michel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>



More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list