[MITgcm-devel] SEAICE_OLD_AND_BAD_DISCRETIZATION

Martin Losch Martin.Losch at awi.de
Mon Oct 26 03:53:03 EDT 2009


OK, fine with me, I have enough other things on my agenda. But it  
would be good not to have this code around for longer than necessary.

Martin

On Oct 23, 2009, at 6:19 PM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Can we wait until Thanksgiving ?
> I have not yet done long integration with "new code"
> for test exp. global_ocean.cs32x15.icedyn
> (and would be like to test what happens when seaice
> extend further than face 3 & 6 and reach the corners)
> Thanks,
> Jean-Michel
>
> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 09:17:01AM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
>> Hi seaice modellers,
>>
>> while I am struggling to convince TAF,  that it should write
>> vectorizable code, I stumbled over this old flag:
>> SEAICE_OLD_AND_BAD_DISCRETIZATION
>> Defining this CPP-flag turns on a discretization that is not yet that
>> old (6months or so), but really bad. We kept this in the code to make
>> sure that we can recover old results (in particular for CS510 and  
>> ECCO
>> GODAE). I personally never want to use this code again, so I am  
>> much in
>> favor of removing this code (because it sometimes means that I have  
>> to
>> code "innovations" (in German: Verschlimmbesserungen) twice). Is  
>> there
>> anyone you still needs this code? Can we retire this flag? (It means
>> changing the seaice part of global_ocean.cs32x15)
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel




More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list