[MITgcm-devel] seaice code beyond checkoint61j blows for ECCO-GODAE

Martin Losch Martin.Losch at awi.de
Wed May 20 10:12:34 EDT 2009


The latter is fine, as long as it fixes your problem.
However, maybe it's a good idea for me to test this myself, so please  
make the package (and it probably will not break over here (o:)

M.

On May 20, 2009, at 2:38 PM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

> Martin, are there any negative consequences to implementing the  
> etaMeanZ=0 boundary fix?  At the very least it would be good to make  
> sure that this also fixes Patrick's ECCO-GODAE reported problem.
>
> P A T R I C K  ---  WE NEED YOU TO RESPOND TO THIS PLEASE ! ! !
>
> I have a configuration (the 18-km Arctic domain with saltplume  
> package turned on) that fails within 20 time steps or so.  The crash  
> occurs suddenly due to sea ice velocity in a near-boundary point  
> (it's touching land by a corner)  in an area where there is no sea  
> ice.  Do you want me to package and send you this configuration?  Or  
> I can generate and send pictures of differences with and without the  
> etaMeanZ=0 fix?
>
> Let me know.  D.
>
> On May 20, 2009, at 4:35 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I am not sure what to do about the problems with the seaice code.
>> Currently there is potentially (most probably) broken code in the
>> repository. I have a suspicion what it is (free-slip boundary
>> conditions), but I cannot reproduce the problems that have been
>> reported (especially not the ECCO-GODAE). Also I cannot narrow down
>> the problem further, if I don't get more details.
>>
>> It seems that Patrick is happy with the running system with seaice
>> reverted to ckpt61j (which I can understand), but I am very
>> uncomfortable with the current code and would like to fix it.
>>
>> Should I go ahead and implement/check-in the fix that has worked for
>> Dimitris (setting etaMeanZ=0 on boundaries in case of free-slip)? Or
>> should I wait until more diagnostics are reported?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On May 14, 2009, at 8:28 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Patrick,
>>>
>>> do you have any further diagnosis for the seaice problem?
>>> SEAICE_no_slip = true or false (default is false)?
>>>
>>> I have a fix for the free slip case, that seems to work for
>>> Dimitris, and if it works for you I can check it in (I probably
>>> should), but first I'd like to hear from you about this.
>>>
>>> Martin
>>>
>>> On May 7, 2009, at 8:26 PM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
>>>
>>>> That's correct.  In all the tests that we have done here, dozens of
>>>> years of integration on the Arctic, Weddell, CS510, and CS510-
>>>> adjoint domains, we have not experienced a single failure when:
>>>>
>>>> i) SEAICE_no_slip=.true.
>>>>
>>>> ii) SEAICE_no_slip=.false. and the etaMeanZ mask is applied.
>>>>
>>>> Patrick, what is your experience with the ECCO-GODAE set up?
>>>>
>>>> D.
>>>>
>>>> On May 6, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Martin Losch wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I would really like to get to the bottom of the blow-ups. As far
>>>>> as I
>>>>> can see they are all with free-slip boundary conditons
>>>>> (SEAICE_no_slip=.false.). Correct? (Patrick?)
>>>>> If that's the case, then I would change the implementation of the
>>>>> free
>>>>> slip BC (include the masking of etaMeanZ).
>>>>
>>>> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>>> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
>>>> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099, USA
>>>> tel: 818-354-1656;  cell: 818-625-6498;  fax: 818-393-6720
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099, USA
> tel: 818-354-1656;  cell: 818-625-6498;  fax: 818-393-6720
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel




More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list