[MITgcm-devel] seaice code beyond checkoint61j blows for ECCO-GODAE

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

That's correct.  In all the tests that we have done here, dozens of  
years of integration on the Arctic, Weddell, CS510, and CS510-adjoint  
domains, we have not experienced a single failure when:

i) SEAICE_no_slip=.true.

ii) SEAICE_no_slip=.false. and the etaMeanZ mask is applied.

Patrick, what is your experience with the ECCO-GODAE set up?

D.

On May 6, 2009, at 11:16 PM, Martin Losch wrote:

> I would really like to get to the bottom of the blow-ups. As far as I
> can see they are all with free-slip boundary conditons
> (SEAICE_no_slip=.false.). Correct? (Patrick?)
> If that's the case, then I would change the implementation of the free
> slip BC (include the masking of etaMeanZ).

Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099, USA
tel: 818-354-1656;  cell: 818-625-6498;  fax: 818-393-6720