[MITgcm-devel] seaice revisited

[Martin Losch]

Hi Patrick,

I did update the output.txt files, but I might have made a mistake: I  
did everyhing on hugo, assuming that it is still a similar machine to  
faulks (in the past I have used eddy, because it gave the same results  
as faulks). Was that stupid?

Martin

PS. do you have time to quickly talk?

On Mar 18, 2009, at 4:49 PM, Patrick Heimbach wrote:

>
> Martin,
>
> I ran lab_sea very quickly with updated code
> (but maybe I missed something(s)):
> * adjoint seems still ok
>  (assuming I don't have to add an extra flag to enable new code
> * testreport output doesn't match the one in results/
>  which I thought you had updated.
>
> Y Y Y Y  6> 5<FAIL  lab_sea/
> Y Y Y Y 16>14<pass  lab_sea/.noseaice
> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea/.noseaicedyn
> Start time:  Wed Mar 18 11:33:52 EDT 2009
> End time:    Wed Mar 18 11:44:17 EDT 2009
>
> -p.
>
> On Mar 18, 2009, at 10:24 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I have checked in all of my seaice ice change that I want to do  
>> now. The only thing that's left is the separation of grid  
>> parameters from the SEAICE.h/seaice_init_varia.F files, but maybe  
>> it's good to see first, if I have already broken the adjoint.
>>
>> I have not yet created the next tag (that would be checkpoint61l).  
>> Let me know if I should do that or first wait for the adjoint tests?
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, we use SEAICE_no_slip=F for the CS510 integrations.
>>>
>>> As soon as checked in, I will try in the Arctic domain first and,  
>>> if that
>>> works well, incorporate in next CS510 integration, which is now long
>>> overdue.
>>>
>>> My preference, once we are comfortable that code works, is to
>>> remove all the old outdated routines, since in any case they
>>> remain available on CVS for the very few who might care about them.
>>>
>>> D.
>>>
>>> On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:31 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Martin,
>>>>
>>>> I am more concern about not being able to check and reproduce
>>>> the ECCO-2 (cs510) runs (and, if I am right, since  
>>>> global_ocean.cs32x15
>>>> uses similar ice-dynamics parameters, can be used as a proxy).
>>>> Dimitris, do you agree ?
>>>> I think both uses SEAICE_no_slip=F (default), so if there is a bug
>>>> there, should not have any impact.
>>>>
>>>> Later on, we could remove all the old version code, but I think
>>>> it would be good to have both versions until we feel 100%  
>>>> confortable
>>>> with the new one.
>>>>
>>>> Jean-Michel
>>>>
>>>> PS: I switch back to mitgcm-devel, (my mistake, sorry).
>>>
>>> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
>>> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
>>> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099, USA
>>> tel: 818-354-1656;  cell: 818-625-6498;  fax: 818-393-6720
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
> ---
> Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
> MIT | EAPS 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge MA 02139 USA
> FON +1-617-253-5259 | FAX +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE patrick.heimbach
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel