[MITgcm-devel] seaice revisited

[Martin Losch]

Hi all,

I have checked in all of my seaice ice change that I want to do now.  
The only thing that's left is the separation of grid parameters from  
the SEAICE.h/seaice_init_varia.F files, but maybe it's good to see  
first, if I have already broken the adjoint.

I have not yet created the next tag (that would be checkpoint61l). Let  
me know if I should do that or first wait for the adjoint tests?

Martin

On Mar 17, 2009, at 10:20 PM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

> Yes, we use SEAICE_no_slip=F for the CS510 integrations.
>
> As soon as checked in, I will try in the Arctic domain first and, if  
> that
> works well, incorporate in next CS510 integration, which is now long
> overdue.
>
> My preference, once we are comfortable that code works, is to
> remove all the old outdated routines, since in any case they
> remain available on CVS for the very few who might care about them.
>
> D.
>
> On Mar 17, 2009, at 4:31 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
>
>> Hi Martin,
>>
>> I am more concern about not being able to check and reproduce
>> the ECCO-2 (cs510) runs (and, if I am right, since  
>> global_ocean.cs32x15
>> uses similar ice-dynamics parameters, can be used as a proxy).
>> Dimitris, do you agree ?
>> I think both uses SEAICE_no_slip=F (default), so if there is a bug
>> there, should not have any impact.
>>
>> Later on, we could remove all the old version code, but I think
>> it would be good to have both versions until we feel 100% confortable
>> with the new one.
>>
>> Jean-Michel
>>
>> PS: I switch back to mitgcm-devel, (my mistake, sorry).
>
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099, USA
> tel: 818-354-1656;  cell: 818-625-6498;  fax: 818-393-6720
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel