[MITgcm-devel] AD lab_sea broken ?

[Patrick Heimbach]

Yep, expected following changes in depth restrictions
in cost functions.
Should be fixed.
-p.

On Jun 18, 2009, at 11:59 AM, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Patrick,
>
> The AD test on faulks and dickens have changed (no longer passing):
> Y Y Y Y  6> 4<FAIL  lab_sea
> Y Y Y Y  2> 2<FAIL  lab_sea.noseaice
> Y Y Y Y  6> 4<FAIL  lab_sea.noseaicedyn
> Is this expected ?
>
> I run the AD test on my laptop (similar to dickens, gfortran) after
> making my changes (but before ours), and everything was passing:
> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea
> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea.noseaice
> Y Y Y Y 16>16<pass  lab_sea.noseaicedyn
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel

---
Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
MIT | EAPS 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge MA 02139 USA
FON +1-617-253-5259 | FAX +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE patrick.heimbach