[MITgcm-devel] Identical executable producing diverging results
Patrick Heimbach
heimbach at MIT.EDU
Fri Dec 25 05:22:39 EST 2009
Hi An,
I diff-ed the two STDOUT.0000
and it appears that one setup starts from
niter0=0,
the other one from
niter0=601824,
That probably explains your problem.
-Patrick
On Dec 23, 2009, at 9:35 PM, An T Nguyen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I wasn't sure where I should send this email, but I'm hoping
> someone could help me with this issue:
>
> I ran 2 experiments (one @ 18km and one @ 9km resolution) back in
> June 2009, and now am repeating
> the exact experiments. The results are diverging, and in 1 case
> the model crashes in 2002 while the
> original experiment ran to 2009 without any problem. The
> divergence is true for both 18km and 9km
> runs, and the first place it diverges is at exf_hflux_max/min/mean/
> sd/del2 and
> exf_sflux_max/min/mean/sd/del2 at time-step 0 in the STDOUT file.
>
> I include here the beginning of two 9-km STDOUT files, one of the
> original run back in June, and one
> of this month run. All input files are identical. Forcing files
> and executables (mitgcmuv) are also identical. The locations of
> these 2 runs are:
>
> Original:
> cfe2:/nobackup2a/menemenl/arctic/arctic_9km/MITgcm/
> exe_firstrun_1992_2009/
>
> Repeat:
> cfe2:/nobackup1/atnguyen/arctic/MITgcm/exe_firstrun_1992_2009
>
> The 18km runs also differ at the same place. Could this be due to
> some changes on the Columbia side?
>
> I also notice that if I repeat the same experiments from pick-up
> files that were generated after Jun 27, 2009, then I get exact
> results. So it seems that results generated prior to approximately
> this date can not be repeated.
>
> Thanks,
> An
>
---
Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
MIT | EAPS 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge MA 02139 USA
FON +1-617-253-5259 | FAX +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE patrick.heimbach
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list