[MITgcm-devel] longtimestep test

[Oliver Jahn]

Hi Jean-Michel,

I like the idea of a small setup.  Could we add GM too?

Oliver

On Sat, 11 Apr 2009, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Oliver,
>
> thinking of what would be a good test for the longtimestep pkg:
> - to reproduce fairly well the KPP mixed layer from the coupled
>  model requires some high frequency forcing, so a lot of
>  files. And would need also to run for few long time-step
>  which means many more dynamical time-step.
>  With a global set-up like cs32 and with a decent vertical resolution,
>  this could take some time to run (with all debug options).
> - alternatively, we could modify a small (toy-like )set-up by adding
>  ptracers + longtimestep (either change it or adding a second test
>  with an input.{something} dir). For example, natl_box (forward)
>  is already using KPP, and the forcing files are already there.
>  and rbcs could be added at the same time with ptracers.
> We can talk on Monday about this.
>
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>