[MITgcm-devel] other problem in recent check-in

[Martin Losch]

Hi Dimitris,

I don't know what to do:
your recent ceckin broke my envisioned (not yet checked in)  
verification experiment, so somethings wrong with your fix, or does  
this mean that you have removed a bug that affected the results if  
yearlyfields=true?

Martin
On 29 Jan 2008, at 12:32, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

>> Here's what I'll do: I'll leave global_with_exf as it is (exept  
>> maybe add the
>> prepare run script of global_ocean.90x40x15) and I'll add another
>> sub-experiment input.yearly, where I design my own new test.
>
> OK.
>
>> The special case does not work, so no reason check in a broken  
>> experiment.
>
> The special case of fldperiod that can vary in length during year  
> transitions and that takes into account leap years should work OK now.
>
> D.
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel