[MITgcm-devel] Problem with lab_sea adjoint test

[Martin Losch]

Hi,

this time I think that I am off the hook as the rheology is not only  
benign, but also should not be seen by the adjoint because it's  
between ifdef's that are undefined by default (SEAICE_ALLOW_TEM). My  
bets are on #3.

Martin

PS. I keep asking this, but can I use TAMC from here, or from within  
the eaps network, so that I can legally test the lab_sea adjoint  
before checking stuff in?

On 19 Jan 2008, at 23:39, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:

> Patrick, is there a way I can help with following:
>
>> The AD testing of the 3 lab_sea experiments is taking much more  
>> time than it use to (more than 100 times more):
>
> What is command line for running the adjoint lab_sea test, that way I
> know when I break something?
>
> The things that have changed in pkg/seaice from Jan 15 to Jan 18 are:
>
> 1. stuff to do with obcs
> 2. stuff to do with rheology (SEAICEuseTEM) that Martin checked in
> 3. removed some unused variables
> 4. moved DIFFERENT_MULTIPLE from seaice_model to seaice_dynsolver
>
> It's probably not #1, since it's all CPPed.
> #2, #3, and #4 pertain mostly to dynamics.
> For #3., one of the changes was to remove the GWATX/Y
> arrays and replace them with U/VVEL.
>
> D.
>
> -- 
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
> tel: 818-354-1656; cell: 818-625-6498; fax: 818-393-6720
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel