[MITgcm-devel] EOS_CHECK

[Martin Losch]

Hi Jean-Michel,

we got ourselves a problem:
- for JMD95Z/P the values are correct only for the surface (p=0), and  
you can easily see why: the values for the bulk modulus are wrong.
- for MDJWF the check pass except for the first one (and I don't see  
why this is so, could be round off)
Note that the first 5 check values are for MDJWF and the remaining  
ones for JMD95 (both from the respective papers), I have included a  
line in the output that makes this clearer.

Now, why is the bulk modulus wrong in these checks? Probably because  
there is an issue with the way pressure is computed?

Martin


On 11 Aug 2008, at 04:10, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> I've just check-in some fixes for the EOS-check, so that it
> compiles and writes something.
> When you have time, could you check that what is written
> with various eosType is right ?
> (was not sure about this bulkMod thing).
>
> Thanks,
> Jean-Michel
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel