[MITgcm-devel] Re: [MITgcm-cvs] MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/results CVS Commit

[Martin Losch]

Hi Jean-Michel,

sorry, didn't realize that the adjoint is using the evp solver.
My changes affect only the lsr solution and do not change the evp  
solution, consequently the adjoint should not be affected (if it uses  
the evp solver).

Martin

On 30 May 2007, at 15:30, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> Just to be sure,
> you did not change the output of the lab_sea test which
> is using the EVP solver, but only the LSR test.
> Can we expect then that the adjoint test will not change
> (since it's not using the LSR solver) ?
> And the reason why lab_sea/results_ad/output_adm.txt is up-to date
> is only because of the previous (from last Friday) changes ?
> Thanks,
> Jean-Michel
>
> On Wed, May 30, 2007 at 06:57:16AM -0400, Martin Losch wrote:
>> Update of /u/gcmpack/MITgcm/verification/lab_sea/results
>> In directory forge:/tmp/cvs-serv22744/verification/lab_sea/results
>>
>> Modified Files:
>> 	output.lsr.txt
>> Log Message:
>> updating verification experiment after latest fixes/changes
>> pending: adjoint (not me!)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-cvs mailing list
>> MITgcm-cvs at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-cvs
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel