[MITgcm-devel] seaice adjoint and EVP
Dimitris Menemenlis
menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov
Sat May 19 02:25:32 EDT 2007
one other way to emphasize differences is to plot log10(1-AREA):
http://ecco2.jpl.nasa.gov/data1/arctic/output/tests/figs/maskedAREA4320.ps
while the LSR solution is very smooth, the EVP solution, even with 1-s time
steps, has some noise
question is whether this noise is intrinsic to EVP scheme or whether it's a
residual bug in the code?
--
Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
tel: 818-354-1656; cell: 818-625-6498; fax: 818-393-6720
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list