[MITgcm-devel] seaice adjoint and EVP

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

> I'll check in this change, once it proves to be a solution to our problems,
> okay? I'll have to test this in my runs an see, whether this causes any
> problems for me.

OK.

> EVP and LSR do have slightly different solutions so I am so surprised that 
> things happen for evp but not for lsr. Naturally these inlets are always a 
> problem should be avoided (no advection in an out possible). I guess it's a 
> good idea to have the flooding stuff turned on be default. (there are a few 
> other defaults that I would like to see, but I need to revisit that, monday)

Random occurrence, it seems.  As luck would have it, for latest Arctic domain 
EVP/LSR tests, but prior to the zmin=0/flooding=.true. change, it is the LSR 
solution that crashes due to excessive snow at that exact same inlet while EVP 
does not.  So I agree, flooding needs to be on by default!

D.