[MITgcm-devel] bug in seaice_ocean_stress?
Martin Losch
Martin.Losch at awi.de
Mon May 14 11:04:17 EDT 2007
I don't think so (although you never know), but I want to make sure
that fixing this bug will not destroy everything we have right now.
M.
On 14 May 2007, at 16:01, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
>> fuIceLoc=HALF*( DWATN(I,J,bi,bj)+DWATN(I,J+1,bi,bj) )*
>> should be
>> fuIceLoc=HALF*( DWATN(I,J,bi,bj)+DWATN(I-1,J,bi,bj) )*
>> and
>> fvIceLoc=HALF*( DWATN(I,J,bi,bj)+DWATN(I+1,J,bi,bj) )*
>> should be
>> fvIceLoc=HALF*( DWATN(I,J,bi,bj)+DWATN(I,J-1,bi,bj) )*
>> if dwatn is defined at C/Mass-points (which they appear to be).
>> Do you agree?
>> Dimitris, could you try this in your Arctic configuration (with
>> and without EVP) (before I check it in)?
>
>
> OK. I will take a look when I get in to work and give it a try.
> Could that be cause of striations? D.
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list