[MITgcm-devel] Re: it's probably my faults again, but ...

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Martin,

Could it be that you are on a platform that do special 
(or don't do) regarding initialisation ? And that this
kind of problem is only there with imissing tiles (="hole") ?
I managed to pass a full test last month on weddell, with
Constantinos magic option to trap un-initialized (local) 
variables. But this missing tiles is not part of the test-list.
Would be a good idea to check-in in Contrib the whole stuff,
as Chris suggested.
Jean-Michel

On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:25:15PM +0100, Martin Losch wrote:
> Yes, it points to a problem in EXCH2_UV.
> Which variables should I check to rule out an EXCH2_Z problem?
> Again, maybe I am just making a stupid mistake.
> 
> Martin
> 
> On 9 Mar 2007, at 16:16, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> 
> >Hi Martin,
> >
> >Just to be sure:
> >Do you have the impression (or more than just an impression)
> >that the Pb is in the EXCH_UV, and not in the other EXCH ?
> >And is EXCH_Z out of the list of suspect ?
> >>From the picture you sent, it seems to me that there is a clear Pb
> >(not a rotation issue, in this sense I don't follow Patrick here).
> >But not sure which EXCH is to blame for.
> >
> >Jean-Michel
> >
> >On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:04:33AM -0500, Patrick Heimbach wrote:
> >>
> >>Hi Martin,
> >>
> >>not sure whether you're aware that what you plotted and labeled
> >>'taux' and 'EXFuwind' is not the zonal component on all faces.
> >>It is actually tauy and EXFvwind on some faces
> >>(due to cs topology).
> >>
> >>I wonder whether what you're seeing is either
> >>* an artifact of the fact that you're looking at rotated fields
> >>  on some faces
> >>* an artifact of diagnostics in plotting vector plots on the cube
> >>
> >>Evidence for this is that you confirm that the scalar fields
> >>do not show the holes.
> >>
> >>-p.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Martin Losch wrote:
> >>
> >>>Well, tell Patrick, that the scalar hflux (diagnostics EXFqnet,
> >>>EXFempmr) does not have these problems, also TFLUX and SFLUX appear
> >>>to be unaffected (although SFLUX does look funny, but not near the
> >>>edges of the tiles).
> >>>
> >>>Martin
> >>>
> >>>PS I am not aware of any recent studies on poppy seed bagels and
> >>>Apple computers.
> >>>On 8 Mar 2007, at 20:31, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>Martin, Patrick asks whether there is a problem with any of the
> >>>>scalar surface flux diagnostics?  Patrick specifically asks
> >>>>whether you can reproduc your plot with hflux.
> >>>>
> >>>>(His brand new MacPro is broken, so I have to write this from my 4-
> >>>>year old PC.)
> >>>>
> >>>>D.
> >>>>_______________________________________________
> >>>>MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >>>>MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >>>>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >>>
> >>>_______________________________________________
> >>>MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >>>MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >>>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >>
> >>---
> >>Dr Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
> >>MIT | EAPS, 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
> >>FON: +1-617-253-5259 | FAX: +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE: patrick.heimbach
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >>MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >>http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >_______________________________________________
> >MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel