[MITgcm-devel] Re: it's probably my faults again, but ...

[Patrick Heimbach]

Hi Martin,

not sure whether you're aware that what you plotted and labeled
'taux' and 'EXFuwind' is not the zonal component on all faces.
It is actually tauy and EXFvwind on some faces
(due to cs topology).

I wonder whether what you're seeing is either
* an artifact of the fact that you're looking at rotated fields
   on some faces
* an artifact of diagnostics in plotting vector plots on the cube

Evidence for this is that you confirm that the scalar fields
do not show the holes.

-p.



On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:05 AM, Martin Losch wrote:

> Well, tell Patrick, that the scalar hflux (diagnostics EXFqnet,  
> EXFempmr) does not have these problems, also TFLUX and SFLUX appear  
> to be unaffected (although SFLUX does look funny, but not near the  
> edges of the tiles).
>
> Martin
>
> PS I am not aware of any recent studies on poppy seed bagels and  
> Apple computers.
> On 8 Mar 2007, at 20:31, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
>
>> Martin, Patrick asks whether there is a problem with any of the  
>> scalar surface flux diagnostics?  Patrick specifically asks  
>> whether you can reproduc your plot with hflux.
>>
>> (His brand new MacPro is broken, so I have to write this from my 4- 
>> year old PC.)
>>
>> D.
>> _______________________________________________
>> MITgcm-devel mailing list
>> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
>> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel

---
Dr Patrick Heimbach | heimbach at mit.edu | http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach
MIT | EAPS, 54-1518 | 77 Massachusetts Ave | Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
FON: +1-617-253-5259 | FAX: +1-617-253-4464 | SKYPE: patrick.heimbach