[MITgcm-devel] SERIOUS performance problems with latest code
Baylor Fox-Kemper
baylor at MIT.EDU
Tue Oct 31 11:02:10 EST 2006
Hi Alistair,
I have been seeing the problems and thought they were related to
the GFDL upgrade. In fact, I already have a HelpDesk request in.
However, talking to Patrick made me think this wasn't the problem...
or at least not all of it!
-Baylor
On Oct 31, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Alistair Adcroft wrote:
> Patrick,
>
> On what systems are you finding performance problems? At GFDL,
> there's been a major overhaul of OS's and there's been a backward
> compatibility problem with object files, executables and
> environment variables.
>
> In your scripts for compiling and running you need to ensure you
> have these modules loaded:
>
> module purge
> module load icc.9.1.042
> module load ifort.9.1.033
> module load scsl-1.5.1.0
> module load mpt-1.14
> module load idb.9.0.12
> module load totalview_730-0
>
> I believe the build_opts file for GFDL has a libarary reference
> that needs to be fixed also. With the above, particularly the mpt
> module, you should see a performance improvement over previous runs
> on the same machine.
>
> A.
>
> Patrick Heimbach wrote:
>> It seems that the latest code has severe
>> performance problems.
>> My ECCO forward run takes 4 times the known
>> performance at NASA/Ames, both with old and
>> new optfiles/compilers.
>>
>> Baylor experiences similar problems,
>> getting only 20% CPU time per wallclock time
>> (expected value at GFDL is around 95%, I think).
>>
>> Anyone witnesses similar problems,
>> or has ideas of what changes in code could cause it?
>>
>> -Patrick
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list