[MITgcm-devel] free drift ice model
Matthew Mazloff
mmazloff at MIT.EDU
Thu Nov 30 11:26:12 EST 2006
Hi Dimitris,
thanks for the advice. Regarding 1 and 2: communication is 75% of
my wallclock time. I need to minimize exchanges, and though I have
not tried it, I am afraid that the ice dynamics solver has too many
exchanges. Switching to EVP would not remedy this but if I could get
away from using the solver every timestep that would be great. My
model dt = 900; Is SEAICE_deltaTdyn = 3600 feasible. How do you
find the seaice performance burden in the high-res cube results?
Regarding 3: I would love to investigate how the ice moves wrt to
ocean in the high-res cube results. Can you point me towards some
files I could analyze?
Thanks,
Matt
On Nov 30, 2006, at 11:10 AM, Dimitris Menemenlis wrote:
> Matt, a few more options for you to consider:
>
> 1) A wonderful recent addition to pkg/seaice, courtesy of Martin,
> is EVP sea-ice dynamic solver, which I suspect would be more
> efficient in your configuration than LSR running at every time step.
> 2) Another way to speed code in your configuration is to set
> SEAICE_deltaTdyn = 3600
> in data.seaice. This is because LSR is implicit in everything
> except Coriolis. That way cost of LSR will become negligible
> relative to other stuff.
>
> 3) For diagnosing how ice moves wrt to ocean, the high-res cube
> results may be more appropriate than the coarser-resolution ECCO-
> GODAE integrations.
>
> D.
>
> --
> Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
> Jet Propulsion Lab, California Institute of Technology
> MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
> tel: 818-354-1656; fax: 818-393-6720
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list