[MITgcm-devel] density

Baylor Fox-Kemper baylor at MIT.EDU
Fri Mar 10 11:17:29 EST 2006


I'd be very much in favor.  It would make the PV calculations a lot  
easier too.  However, with nonlinear EOS, one would still need to  
calculate density again to figure out N^2.  But, it would be nicer to  
have that as a special case that gets called only with nonlinear EOS...
   -Baylor



On Mar 10, 2006, at 9:21 AM, Patrick Heimbach wrote:

>
> Hi there,
>
> the density calculation and diagnostics
> in do_oceanic_physics is a mess (I think).
> Can't we just make density a 3-d array
> once and for all?
>
> It would also save me a lot of fooling
> with TAF to keep diagnostics that
> would otherwise be thrown out
> (e.g. simple call to diags_rho requires
> some stupid recomp.).
>
> -Patrick
>
> -- 
> --------------------------------------------------------
> Patrick Heimbach   Massachusetts Institute of Technology
> FON: +1/617/253-5259                  EAPS, Room 54-1518
> FAX: +1/617/253-4464             77 Massachusetts Avenue
> mailto:heimbach at mit.edu               Cambridge MA 02139
> http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/                        USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel




More information about the MITgcm-devel mailing list