[MITgcm-devel] following on verif_basic

[Patrick Heimbach]

Hi,

to pick up the compression suggestion,
we could/should compress all output.txt,
testreport than un-compresses as needed,
and re-compresses afterwards.

-p.

On Mon, 2006-07-10 at 03:01, Martin Losch wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I think that Jean-Michel's selection is good, I would not reduce the  
> number of experiments any further. Reducing global_ocean.90x40x15 to  
> under 10MB would be nice, though ...
> 
> Martin
> 
> Martin
> On Jul 9, 2006, at 6:41 PM, chris hill wrote:
> 
> > > to (what I propose):
> > > 13504   aim.5l_cs/
> > > 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> > > 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> > > 528     ideal_2D_oce/
> > > 6664    lab_sea/
> > > 820     rotating_tank/
> > > 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> > > 44392   .
> > >
> >
> > I would rather
> >
> > > ?????   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> > > 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> > > 528     ideal_2D_oce/
> > > 6664    lab_sea/
> > > 820     rotating_tank/
> > > 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> > > 332     tutorial_baroclinic_gyre/
> >
> > ????? above is because I think we can make global_ocean/ smaller.  
> > For example without qshyd and compressing the large .txt results sets.
> >
> > I don't think having aim_5l/ in the basic tests is needed as long  
> > as we make sure it stays on the main testing we do.
> >
> > tutorial_baroclinic_gyre/ is a good very basic test.
> >
> > Chris
> >
> > Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> >> Hi Martin (& Ed),
> >> Ed proposed to remove the 2 CVS modules:
> >>  MITgcm_verif_atmos
> >>  MITgcm_verif_ocean
> >> And to keep an updated version of:
> >>  MITgcm_verif_basic
> >> If we agree on a small number of small (let's say, below 10.M)
> >> experiments in verif_basic (that will always remain independent),
> >> the way we use "prepare_run" is no longer an issue.
> >> Regarding the modification of MITgcm_verif_basic, the current list  
> >> of experiments is:
> >> global_ocean.90x40x15
> >>   <- keep it for now, until we switch to tutorial_global_oce_latlon
> >>      (without the input.qshyd and result_ad*, size will go down,  
> >> below 10.M)
> >> aim.5l_cs   <- too big ?
> >> hs94.128x64x5 <- ?
> >>       I would keep those 2 atmospheric set-up (one on Lat-Long,
> >>       the other on CS grid), since aim.5l_cs is testing plenty of AIM
> >>         / Land / thsice stuff.
> >>       alternatively, we can put insead aim.5l_LatLon &  
> >> tutorial_held_suarez_cs,
> >>       but these 2 together take more space than aim.5l_cs +  
> >> hs94.128x64x5);
> >> front_relax
> >>  <- quiet simple, would prefer ideal_2D_oce (test diagnostics,
> >>     mnc, all gmredi options not already tested in global_ocean. 
> >> 90x40x15)
> >> tutorial_barotropic_gyre
> >>   <- so simple that I am ready to remove it
> >> tutorial_plume_on_slope
> >>   <- keep it (test NH, variable dX, AdvScheme=33)
> >> tutorial_global_oce_biogeo
> >>   <- far too big
> >> I would add 2 small tests (removing tutorial_barotropic_gyre &
> >>  tutorial_global_oce_biogeo, the total number would be unchanged).
> >> lab_sea
> >>   <- test sea-ice, exf
> >> rotating_tank
> >>   <- test cylindrical grid & NH
> >> Now, in term of disk space (& data to download),
> >> we will go from (currently):
> >> 13504   aim.5l_cs/
> >> 492     front_relax/
> >> 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> >> 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> >> 332     tutorial_barotropic_gyre/
> >> 26244   tutorial_global_oce_biogeo/
> >> 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> >> 63468   .
> >> to (what I propose):
> >> 13504   aim.5l_cs/
> >> 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> >> 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> >> 528     ideal_2D_oce/
> >> 6664    lab_sea/
> >> 820     rotating_tank/
> >> 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> >> 44392   .
> >> What do you (and anyone who use those CVS alias) think of this ?
> >> Cheers,
> >> Jean-Michel
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> >> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> >> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > MITgcm-devel mailing list
> > MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> > http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Heimbach   Massachusetts Institute of Technology
FON: +1/617/253-5259                  EAPS, Room 54-1518
FAX: +1/617/253-4464             77 Massachusetts Avenue
mailto:heimbach at mit.edu               Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/                        USA