[MITgcm-devel] following on verif_basic

[chris hill]

 > to (what I propose):
 > 13504   aim.5l_cs/
 > 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
 > 660     hs94.128x64x5/
 > 528     ideal_2D_oce/
 > 6664    lab_sea/
 > 820     rotating_tank/
 > 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
 > 44392   .
 >

I would rather

 > ?????   global_ocean.90x40x15/
 > 660     hs94.128x64x5/
 > 528     ideal_2D_oce/
 > 6664    lab_sea/
 > 820     rotating_tank/
 > 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
 > 332     tutorial_baroclinic_gyre/

????? above is because I think we can make global_ocean/ smaller. For 
example without qshyd and compressing the large .txt results sets.

I don't think having aim_5l/ in the basic tests is needed as long as we 
make sure it stays on the main testing we do.

tutorial_baroclinic_gyre/ is a good very basic test.

Chris

Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> Hi Martin (& Ed),
> 
> Ed proposed to remove the 2 CVS modules:
>  MITgcm_verif_atmos
>  MITgcm_verif_ocean
> And to keep an updated version of:
>  MITgcm_verif_basic
> 
> If we agree on a small number of small (let's say, below 10.M)
> experiments in verif_basic (that will always remain independent),
> the way we use "prepare_run" is no longer an issue.
> 
> Regarding the modification of MITgcm_verif_basic, the current list 
> of experiments is:
> global_ocean.90x40x15
>   <- keep it for now, until we switch to tutorial_global_oce_latlon
>      (without the input.qshyd and result_ad*, size will go down, below 10.M)
> aim.5l_cs   <- too big ?
> hs94.128x64x5 <- ?
>       I would keep those 2 atmospheric set-up (one on Lat-Long,
>       the other on CS grid), since aim.5l_cs is testing plenty of AIM
>         / Land / thsice stuff.
>       alternatively, we can put insead aim.5l_LatLon & tutorial_held_suarez_cs,
>       but these 2 together take more space than aim.5l_cs + hs94.128x64x5);
> front_relax
>  <- quiet simple, would prefer ideal_2D_oce (test diagnostics,
>     mnc, all gmredi options not already tested in global_ocean.90x40x15)
> tutorial_barotropic_gyre
>   <- so simple that I am ready to remove it
> tutorial_plume_on_slope
>   <- keep it (test NH, variable dX, AdvScheme=33)
> tutorial_global_oce_biogeo
>   <- far too big
> 
> I would add 2 small tests (removing tutorial_barotropic_gyre &
>  tutorial_global_oce_biogeo, the total number would be unchanged).
> lab_sea
>   <- test sea-ice, exf
> rotating_tank
>   <- test cylindrical grid & NH
> 
> Now, in term of disk space (& data to download),
> we will go from (currently):
> 13504   aim.5l_cs/
> 492     front_relax/
> 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> 332     tutorial_barotropic_gyre/
> 26244   tutorial_global_oce_biogeo/
> 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> 63468   .
> 
> to (what I propose):
> 13504   aim.5l_cs/
> 21460   global_ocean.90x40x15/
> 660     hs94.128x64x5/
> 528     ideal_2D_oce/
> 6664    lab_sea/
> 820     rotating_tank/
> 720     tutorial_plume_on_slope/
> 44392   .
> 
> What do you (and anyone who use those CVS alias) think of this ?
> 
> Cheers,
> Jean-Michel
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>