[MITgcm-devel] update on radiation part of bulk code

[Martin Losch]

Hi Patrick,

I was only joking!!!!

Martin
On 23 Dec 2006, at 01:22, Patrick Heimbach wrote:

> Quoting Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at sbcglobal.net>:
>
>>> Patrick: we need optimized parameters for exf. When are you  
>>> finally going to do it? (o:
>>
>> This is also what I was going to suggest for Patrick.  Would it be  
>> hard to add
>> emissivity and albedo as time-mean, spatially invariant control  
>> parameters?  But
>> that would not necessarily solve your problem Martin, unless you  
>> used same model
>> configuration, optimized surface boundary conditions, and  
>> integration period.
>
> Wasn't clear tome that this was so high on everyone's wish list.
> I'll do it.
> But the "lesson" from previous ECCO-type integrations still leaves  
> some
> puzzles,doesn't it,
> about the increases in theta misfits, and decreases in salt misfits...
>
> -p.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel