[MITgcm-devel] diagnostics
Patrick Heimbach
heimbach at MIT.EDU
Mon Oct 17 21:11:44 EDT 2005
Hi there,
the routine forward_step.F isn't a very good place
for calls to
CALL DIAGNOSTICS_SWITCH_ONOFF
and
CALL DO_STATEVARS_DIAGS
at least from an AD point of view
(TAF likes to kick out "passive" routines;
there's a work-around, but the more elegant solution
is to hide passive calls from TAF alltogether).
Can these calls go somewhere else, e.g. at the beginning
of thermodynamics?
I guess, the case (.NOT.staggerTimeStep) would cover
CALL DIAGNOSTICS_SWITCH_ONOFF( myTime, 0, myIter, myThid )
and the case (staggerTimeStep) would cover
CALL DIAGNOSTICS_SWITCH_ONOFF( myTime, 1, myIter, myThid )
but maybe I missed something(?)
-Patrick
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Patrick Heimbach Massachusetts Institute of Technology
FON: +1/617/253-5259 EAPS, Room 54-1518
FAX: +1/617/253-4464 77 Massachusetts Avenue
mailto:heimbach at mit.edu Cambridge MA 02139
http://www.mit.edu/~heimbach/ USA
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list