[MITgcm-devel] monitor and ptracers

[Jean-Michel Campin]

Hi Martin,

exf_monitor and seaice_monitor are not independant from the 
main monitor (may be, they should), and i would rather
comparare the ptracer monitor with an other one (e.g., land, thsice)
which has it's own PKG_monitorFreq.

Jean-Michel

On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 10:07:41PM +0200, Martin Losch wrote:
> Ed,
> I am sorry, I can't do it myself:
> the monitor output for passive tracers does not appear in monitor.*.nc, 
> if
> useMNC=.true.,
> and
> monitor_mnc=.true., (the default)
> It seems to work for exf_monitor and seaice_monitor, but for some 
> reason not for ptracers_monitor. The difference may be that the former 
> are called from within monitor.F while the latter is called a little 
> later from ptracers_output (from within do_the_model_io).
> I suspect that in ptracers_monitor the following section is missing 
> (after the first _END_MASTER(myThid)):
> >#ifdef ALLOW_MNC
> >        IF (useMNC .AND. monitor_mnc) THEN
> >          DO i = 1,MAX_LEN_MBUF
> >            mon_fname(i:i) = ' '
> >          ENDDO
> >          mon_fname(1:7) = 'monitor'
> >          CALL MNC_CW_APPEND_VNAME(
> >     &         'T', '-_-_--__-__t', 0,0, myThid)
> >          CALL MNC_CW_SET_UDIM(mon_fname, -1, myThid)
> >          CALL MNC_CW_RL_W_S(
> >     &        'D',mon_fname,1,1,'T', myTime, myThid)
> >          CALL MNC_CW_SET_UDIM(mon_fname, 0, myThid)
> >          mon_write_mnc = .TRUE.
> >        ENDIF
> >#endif /*  ALLOW_MNC  */
> Seriously, I don't know what this is doing, but when I include this 
> part in ptracers_monitor, I get at least some output. Can you check for 
> me, whether this is correct, and I'll check the stuff in.
> 
> Martin
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel