[MITgcm-devel] DFLOAT and TAF don't like each other
Jean-Michel Campin
jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Wed Jan 26 21:52:45 EST 2005
Hi Patrick,
> the reason why the adjoint tests fail since yesterday
> is your change of FLOAT -> DFLOAT in external_fields_load.F
> If you don't mind, I'll put it back to FLOAT for now.
> I'll also request to Fastopt that the make
> DFLOAT work with TAF.
OK.
I still want to give a try with g77 and this -sse option.
I will put this DFLOAT within #ifdef ALLOW_AUTODIFF_TAMC
for now. If this happens to be a dead-end, we will go back
to the old g77 option and get rid of the DFLOAT.
The purpose is to try to get closer agreement between different
platforms, and it's hard to test all of them without checking-in
the new output.txt
Is it OK like this ?
Jean-Michel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list