[MITgcm-devel] naming rule

[Ed Hill]

On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 14:03 -0500, Jean-Michel Campin wrote:
> And in a more general way, S/R in one package (pkgA)
> that only contains code that is connected to a 2nd package (pkgB)
> could be named: pkgA_pkgB_something.F (and not pkgA_something_pkgB.F)
> Is is OK like this ?

I vote for:  pkgA_pkgB_something.F

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 at mit.edu                ed at eh3.com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464