[MITgcm-devel] global_ocean.90x40x15 fails on my linux g77 box

[Chris Hill]

JM/Martin,

 One thought:

 Would it be good to add the vertical mixing term using a
 _kappaRTr(I,j,k,bi,bj,iTracer) macro. That could be defined as
 
 #define _kapppaRTri,j,k,bi,bj,iTracer) kappaRTr(iTracer)

 by default but it would allow three-d switching (for all tracers) easily. 
 It requires a tiny bit more care when adding the term but otherwise its not
 really any extra work!

 What do you think?

Chris 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org 
> [mailto:mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of 
> Jean-Michel Campin
> Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:56 AM
> To: mlosch at awi-bremerhaven.de
> Cc: MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> Subject: Re: [MITgcm-devel] global_ocean.90x40x15 fails on my 
> linux g77 box
> 
> Hi Martin,
> 
> How is it going with all your vertical mixing schemes ?
> 
> regarding global_ocean.90x40x15 "fail", I need to explain to 
> Ed how to use "testreport" before checking-in new things :-)
> 
> More seriously, I was thinking of changing calc_diffusivity.F 
> so that all ptracers can have their own background 
> diffusivity but without increasing the number of 3d array
> kappaRT,kappaRS,kappaRTr(1) ...
> 
> I was waiting until you check-in those 2 new vertical mixing 
> schemes ggl90 & opps and will also wait for Patrick to catch 
> up with TAF. Just to let you know the short-term plan, in 
> case you were thinking of fixing this same piece of code.
> 
> See you,
> Cheers,
> 
> Jean-Michel
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
>