[MITgcm-devel] initialisation and mnc
Jean-Michel Campin
jmc at ocean.mit.edu
Thu Oct 7 19:28:44 EDT 2004
Hi Ed,
I have a little comment about the initialisation required for mnc:
1) about cd_code:
it should go (and call from) packages_init_fixed.F
and I would prefer not to have this piece of code in
cd_code_ini_vars.F (called from packages_init_variables.F)
It's also an advantage for TAF that does not see most of the
init_fixed part (Patrick, do you agree ?).
2) about time_ave:
I would call the routine you added "timeave_init.F" with a name that
clearly reflect that it's mnc or I/O or fixed initialisation.
The reason is that with this name, someone who see this pkg
would guess that the initialisation of the time-average arrays
is done within timeave_init.F , which is not the case.
Does someone agree or disagree with those 2 points ?
I know that this ini_fixed / ini_var is a little subtil and hard
to figure out first, but it makes sense in some way.
See you,
Jean-Michel
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list