[MITgcm-devel] Checkpoint?

[Ed Hill]

On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 09:58, Chris Hill wrote:
> All,
> 
> It sounds like we are close to where we can create a checkpoint. Is that
> right?


My vote is: "Yes -- after I undo the mnc default setting."

Alistair added mnc to the default list of packages and that broke a lot
of systems that don't have NetCDF installed as you can see at:

  http://mitgcm.org/testing.html

I'm too busy right now with Dimitris' cube data to spend my time either
installing NetCDF on a half-dozen systems or mucking about with genmake2
so that mnc is automatically turned off when the NetCDF headers and
libraries can't be found.

So *please*, lets revert this default for now and put it on a to-do
list.

Ed

-- 
Edward H. Hill III, PhD
office:  MIT Dept. of EAPS;  Rm 54-1424;  77 Massachusetts Ave.
             Cambridge, MA 02139-4307
emails:  eh3 at mit.edu                ed at eh3.com
URLs:    http://web.mit.edu/eh3/    http://eh3.com/
phone:   617-253-0098
fax:     617-253-4464
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://mitgcm.org/pipermail/mitgcm-devel/attachments/20040505/d14c2913/attachment.sig>