[MITgcm-devel] Re: CCP_EEOPTIONS

[Alistair Adcroft]

> Where do you see USE_EXCH2?

Whenever the exch2 package is enabled by genmake2 the CPP variable USE_EXCH2
is defined. Better check with Ed in case I'm wrong and it's ALLOW_EXCH2 but
either way, it is there to be used in conjunction with packages. If we
switch to that variable then it should be easier to use exch2 in other
experiments.  Not a priority...

Do all the exch2 experiments still work for you after my CPP_EEOPTIONs
clean-up? I did check them all in single-proc mode.

A.
--
Dr Alistair Adcroft            http://www.mit.edu/~adcroft
MIT Climate Modeling Initiative        tel: (617) 253-5938
EAPS 54-1523,  77 Massachusetts Ave,  Cambridge,  MA,  USA

-----Original Message-----
From: mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org
[mailto:mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Eichmann
Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 2:57 PM
To: MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
Subject: Re: [MITgcm-devel] Re: CCP_EEOPTIONS


* Alistair Adcroft <adcroft at mit.edu> wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at
10:49:58AM -0500
> Andy,
> 
> Is USE_W2 synonymous with USE_EXCH2 in that if you are using exch2
> then USE_W2 is always defined or doe it do something else?

Where do you see USE_EXCH2?

> BTW, after yesterdays discussion, do you know what more mnc might need
> to do before you can design a netcdf/mnc version of the tile*.mitgrid 
> files? You might want to let Ed know if there's a new dimension (face 
> index) required? It will be more than an attribute and might upset his 
> plans ...

We're working on it, thanks.

-A(FE)

> 
> A.
> --
> Dr Alistair Adcroft            http://www.mit.edu/~adcroft
> MIT Climate Modeling Initiative        tel: (617) 253-5938
> EAPS 54-1523,  77 Massachusetts Ave,  Cambridge,  MA,  USA
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org
> [mailto:mitgcm-devel-bounces at mitgcm.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Eichmann
> Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:24 AM
> To: MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> Subject: [MITgcm-devel] Re: CCP_EEOPTIONS
> 
> 
> * Alistair Adcroft <adcroft at mit.edu> wrote on Thu, Jan 22, 2004 at
> 09:49:35AM -0500
> 
> > As for the CS expts, I did try removing CPP_EEOPTIONS.h from them
> > but they broke so I left them in place - I have no idea why they are 
> > needed but imagine that exch and exch2 are using the same header 
> > files which is quite sensible and forward looking.
> 
> A+JM,
> 
> They have the line
> #define USE_W2
> and exch2 includes some header files that exch does not (and would 
> not).
> 
> exch2 is also specified in packages.conf, a redundancy which probably
> ought to be remedied.  But until exch2 is the only cs exchange option, 
> I think some cruft is unavoidable.
> 
> -AFE
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MITgcm-devel mailing list
> MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org
> http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel
_______________________________________________
MITgcm-devel mailing list
MITgcm-devel at mitgcm.org http://dev.mitgcm.org/mailman/listinfo/mitgcm-devel