[MITgcm-devel] Re: Package configuration
Alistair Adcroft
adcroft at MIT.EDU
Tue Sep 30 14:10:23 EDT 2003
> Does that make more sense?
Yes - indeed it does make more sense. I bet someone will put an FC=pgf77 or
NOOPTFILES= in gm_local oneday soon. Still a shame about the name (which is
why I didn't get it). I mistakenly thought the gm_local was a product of
genmake2 like gm_state and gm_optfile.
Another thought is that package configuration should be associated with the
code mods. Currently, we can't build the code correctly elsewhere from
input/ unless the run-time input data is linked first which doesn't make
sense.
See you tomorrow, A.
More information about the MITgcm-devel
mailing list