[MITgcm-devel] Re: option for backward compatibility

[Dimitris Menemenlis]

Salut Jean-Michel,

> If you prefer, I can do it, it's not a problem.
> (I know it's already the 2nd time you check-in those 
>  modif, sorry to bother you again)

If you can take over from here that would be great.

The backward compatibility option would require two definitions
of FREEZE, one with bi, bj, arguments, one without.  Also there
is a new bit in ini_theta that would need to be turned off.

I have not yet moved ICE_FORCING and ICE_FREEZE.  It's
better if you do that.  Look at the new FREEZE for an
example of how to set surfaceTendencyTice

I have not yet modified Qnet.

Finally, I was running verification experiments on faulks
last night, to generate the new output.txt, but run out
of disk space.

OK, I will assume you are taking these bits over, unless I
hear otherwise from you.

Cheers, D.

-- 
Dimitris Menemenlis <menemenlis at jpl.nasa.gov>
Jet Propulsion Lab, California Insitute of Technology
MS 300-323, 4800 Oak Grove Dr, Pasadena CA 91109-8099
tel: 818-354-1656;  fax: 818-393-6720